Menu

Home » Editing»

(Credit: Pixabay)

In the past week, several news outlets — the Toronto Star, the Globe and Mail, the Canadian Press and the New York Times–have released guidance on reporting on the so-called “alt-right”.

As iMediaEthics previously reported, the Associated Press issued guidance Nov. 29, advising journalists to use “alt-right” in quotes and most importantly include a description or explanation for readers, such as “a white nationalist movement.”

In a Dec. 2 column, “‘Alt-right’? No, call it racism,” Toronto Star public editor Kathy English wrote that the Star gave its staff advice on reporting on the alt-right and describing the alt-right. “With all that’s at stake here, journalists must not rely on euphemistic words that gloss over racism and hate,” English wrote.

English got straight to the point: “To be clear: the so-called alt-right stands for white supremacy. By any definition, that is racism.”

The Star‘s guidance is below, and similar to the Associated Press’s:

“Avoid using alt-right generically. We should strive to be accurate and precise, and at least for now, the term ‘alt-right.’ is neither. Terms like ‘white nationalist’ or ‘white supremacist’ are known, accurate and much clearer to readers.”

You May Also Like...

Jon Stewart takes on Rolling Stone's UVA rape story on Daily Show

“If you use the term alt-right, define it. Phrasing like ‘the ‘alt-right,’ a white nationalist movement’ is appropriate.”

The Globe and Mail‘s public editor Sylvia Stead reported Nov. 30 that the newspaper intends to “avoid” the term the alt-right, which she noted is “Orwellian Newspeak.”

The Globe‘s guidance?

“The term alt-right refers to a collection of groups or individuals espousing racist, fascist or white-supremacist ideologies. We should avoid this term as much as possible. If we must use it, in a quote, for example, we should provide a definition of the term.”

The Canadian Press, a wire service, said Nov. 29 that alt-right should be “sparingly” used, Canadian journalism site J-Source reported. References to the term alt-right must include “modifiers (‘self-proclaimed,’ ‘so-called’) and include description in copy: ‘a U.S.-based white nationalist movement’ or, if space permits, ‘a U.S.-based offshoot of conservatism that combines elements of racism, white nationalism and populism.'”

The New York Times‘ standards editor Phil Corbett also issued a memo about alt-right, recommending it be described as a “racist, far-right fringe movement that embraces an ideology of white nationalism and is anti-immigrant, anti-Semitic and anti-feminist,” Politico reported.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

How 4 News Outlets Recommend Reporting on the Alt-Right: Roundup

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *