BIG STORIES :
News Corp. | Phone Hacking Scandal | WikiLeaks | Barack Obama | Julian Assange | 2012 U.S. Election | Religion | See All
iMEDIAETHICS.org
Seperator
 
Tips Facebook Twitter Twitter Twitter RSS Feeds
 
Home | | Contact Us

Media Business Ethics News :
News Story
Comments (2)
Print Tweet Email

Anatomy of a Correction / Correction of Anatomy

13ABC.com headline writers learn that a leg is not a foot
By: Adam Klasfeld
November 29, 2007 12:00 AM EST
 
Anatomy of a Correction / Correction of Anatomy
 
 

UPDATED 12/3/07

If StinkyJournalism staffers are the self-knighted superheroes of fact-checking, then Google Alerts are our trusty sidekicks.  When founder Rhonda Roland Shearer received a suspicious news alert about an article from Toledo's WTVG ("Pit bull chews off boys leg, mother sentenced"), she immediately smelled that something wasn't right.  A thought bubble appeared over her head, reading, "A pit bull chewed off a leg?"

She also noticed a strange line in the last paragraph of the story which read "Investigators believe they may never know what really happened." It seems WTVG had capitalized on the furor - and web traffic - pit bull stories generate, while ignoring a gaping hole in their own reporting.

Instantly, she dispatched pit bull- coverage guru Adam Klasfeld to investigate.  Interestingly, the article below the headline had the correct information: The dog chewed off the boy's foot, and not the whole leg.  A Laurel-and-Hardy-worthy transcript of Klasfeld's conversation with the editors of WTVG documents how a correction came to be made.  

(Shearer is still looking into the assertion that investigators are unsure about the circumstances of the attack.)

STINKYJOURNALISM:  I’m calling from Art Science Research Lab.  My name is Adam Klasfeld.  How are you doing?

WTVG:  OK.

STINKYJOURNALISM:   I saw a headline on your website, “Pit bull chews off boy’s leg, mother sentenced.”

WTVG:  Correct.  Well, bit his foot off.

STINKYJOURNALISM:  Oh, it’s been corrected?

WTVG:  No.  The pit bull chewed the boy’s—

STINKYJOURNALISM:   Foot.

WTVG:  Foot.

STINKYJOURNALISM:   Yes.  Exactly.

WTVG:  Just the foot.

STINKYJOURNALISM:  That’s what I was calling about.  Has that been corrected?

WTVG:   Has it been corrected?  You mean...

STINKYJOURNALISM:  The title of the article is, “Pit bull chews off boy’s leg, mother sentenced,” and in the article itself it says that it was the 4-year-old’s foot.  I can give you the web address if you’d like.

WTVG:  Hold on a second.  I’m pulling it up right now.  “Pit bull chews off...”  Oh, you’re right!  “...boy’s leg, mother sentenced.”  It should be just his foot.

STINKYJOURNALISM:  Yes.

WTVG:  I’ll have them correct that.

STINKYJOURNALISM:   Do you know who wrote the headline and the article?

WTVG:  No I don’t.

STINKYJOURNALISM:   There’s no way of finding that out?

WTVG:  Hold on one second.

(WTVG transfers STINKYJOURNALISM to two offices, and eventually a voice mail.   STINKYJOURNALISM's message is not returned.  WTVG corrects the title without notice or explanation.)

 

Line
Print   Print
Line
Twitter   Tweet
Report an Error Report an Error
Email   E-mail
Link Send a Tip
 
Please send us tips on stinky reports that you find.
Send to info@asrlab.org
Comment by Rhonda R. Shearer | Nov 29, 2007 at 03:55 PM EST
Importantly, readers should note that this headline correction was made without any transparency or accountability on the part of 13ABC.

Obviously, this error of citing a pit bull chewing off a "leg" is far more sensational than this poor victim's foot...However, the money quote in this 13ABC report offers a troubling clue about the larger "stinkyness" in the case: "Investigators believe they may never know what really happened." What? In other words, there is still doubt, despite the conviction and sentencing, about how the boy sustained this horrible injury? Yet, without any qualification or question, 13ABC allows, in their sensational report, to let the pit bull takes the fall...

Pit bulls headlines drive web traffic. Shouldn't media outlets, such as 13ABC, have more to say, than one line, regarding investigators doubts? I believe 13ABC clearly had a duty to do more than passively report, without attribution or detail, the investigators' misgivings.

Comment by Rhonda R. Shearer | Nov 30, 2007 at 09:57 AM EST
 
 
  RESOURCES FOR EDUCATORS
 
Checkout iMediaEthics Resources for Educators, a helpful section for colleges, institutions, students and teachers.
Ethics Codes Case Studies Sites We Like
Ethics Codes Case Studies Sites We Like
 
   DAVID MOORE ON POLLS [See All]   
9 in 10 Americans can be classified as Racist against Either Blacks or Whites?  What the AP Poll on Racial Attitudes really tells Us, Part 2.
PollSkeptic Report:   9 in 10 Americans can be classified as Racist...
What the AP Poll on Racial Attitudes Really Tells Us, Part 1
PollSkeptic Report:   What the AP Poll on Racial Attitudes Really Tells...
David Moore
PollTalk Blog:   3 in 10 Voters Believe Armed Revolution Might Be...
   MORE BY THIS AUTHOR [See All]   
   SIMILAR TOPIC
 
CNN Covers Up Error in Cleveland Kidnappings Case: Amanda Berry NOT Ariel Castro's Daughter's Best Friend
CNN Covers Up Error in Cleveland Kidnappings Case: Amanda Berry NOT Ariel Castro's Daughter's Best Friend
CNN's Michael Martinez made an error in his May 12...
 
Sports Reporter Fired after 'Tremendous Amount of Sex' Freudian Slip
Sports Reporter Fired after 'Tremendous Amount of Sex' Freudian Slip
Comcast SportsNet Chicago fired sports reporter Susannah...
 
Toronto Star's Front-Page Apology 1st in 18 Years, Story was 'Entirely Wrong,' Public Editor Says
Toronto Star's Front-Page Apology 1st in 18 Years, Story was 'Entirely Wrong,' Public Editor Says
 
Bronx 5-Alarm Blaze Fact Check Shows Sloppy Local Reporting, Not Just In National Breaking News Coverage
Bronx 5-Alarm Blaze Fact Check Shows Sloppy Local Reporting, Not Just In National Breaking News Coverage
It is easy to critique the media for errors during...
 
   TWITTER
   FACEBOOK
   LATEST STORIES [See All]