Menu

Home » Media's Future»

(Credit: GigaOm, screenshot)

In a Sept. 7 post, Giga Om’s Mathew Ingram criticized suggestions of “licensing journalists” to help rein in journalism. (See iMediaEthics’ story here about Quebec culture minister Christine St-Pierre’s calls to license journalists.)  GigaOm describes itself as “the leading provider of online media, events and research for global technology innovators.”

In response to the age-old question of bloggers versus journalists, Ingram concluded that the main difference between bloggers and journalists is “perhaps the publishing platform they use, or the name on the masthead of the entity they work for.”

You May Also Like...

Hoax alert! Jesse Pinkman & 36 Others not Killed from Marijuana, And Lost's Jack Shepard isn't the Doctor

Ingram argued against government regulation of journalists and used the defense of potential censorship: if we allow definitions of journalist and non-journalist, then the possibility arises of information only being provided to certain people and the government gains control of the media. Read Ingram’s post here.

 

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Giga Om’s Mathew Ingram: Licensing Journalists a Bad Idea

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *