Menu

Home » Bad Taste»

LAT readers complained over LAT's labeling Jaycee Dugard a 'sex slave.'

Many readers complained over a July 10 headline calling Jaycee Dugard a “sex slave,” Los Angeles Times readers representative Deirdre Edgar wrote.

The story (see here) reported on a recent interview ABC News conducted with Dugard. Dugard was kidnapped when she was 11 years old and held “captive” in a backyard shed for eighteen years.

According to Edgar, “editors who worked on the story…agreed, in hindsight” with readers that a more sensitive and accurate term would fit Dugard’s kidnapping.  One reader suggested “kidnap victim” in lieu of “sex slave,” according to Edgar.

You May Also Like...

Measuring Subway Platform Discredits NY Post Abbasi Subway Photo Tale

Assistant copy desk chief Jim LaVally reportedly commented that the sex slave label, on reflection, is “loaded with mostly lurid connotations. And it robs the victim of dignity. I think we can find an acceptable alternative.”

Edgar noted that in a later article that week on Dugard the Los Angeles Times simply referred to Dugard by name and without a label.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

LA Times Readers Criticize Labeling Jaycee Dugard “Sex Slave”

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *