The New York Times Cairo Bureau Chief David Kirkpatrick’s reporting from Egypt shows a heavy reliance on anonymous sources and unnamed media outlets, according to an analysis by iMediaEthics.
As part of its investigative series on international reporting about Egypt, which has included more than 125 interviews in Egypt, iMediaEthics found that Kirkpatrick has even failed to interview sources featured in headlines to give them an opportunity to rebut or correct facts or statements.
Since iMediaEthics began informing the Times of these reporting problems on Dec. 3, the reports of Dec. 13 and 15 show a dramatic, commendable turnaround. The Times indicates Egypt’s Foreign Ministry was contacted before both stories’ publication.
The second story took Egypt’s evidence and point of view seriously and liberally quoted the spokesman’s rebuttal, in steep contrast to the paper’s earlier reporting.
You May Also Like...
Before this U-turn, sources in Egypt who were included in Times’ reports or whose institutions were central to news events, such as student protester violence, told iMediaEthics that, during the past eight months, they have become angry and distrustful of international media since the Times bureau never contacted them for interviews or fact-checking.
The Grand Mufti, the Coptic Pope, officials at Cairo and Al Azhar universities, the Ministry of the Interior, State Information Services, and victims and families of protester violence in major incidents say bureau chief Kirkpatrick’s stories don’t include key facts or their rebuttals. Results from iMediaEthics’ recent interviews and study support this belief.
iMediaEthics’ count of sources of the 12 stories between Oct. 26 and Dec. 2, 2014 from the Times Cairo Bureau reveals that 25 percent of the stories had corrections appended and that the stories quoted 15 critics of the Egyptian government while only one supporter of the Sisi government was quoted. Five of the 12 reports contained no named sources interviewed by the Times. The articles’ frequent quoting of anonymous sources (38 in 12 reports) and their reliance on news releases (12 instances) or unnamed “state news media” (19 instances) begged for more original named sources and more extensive reporting. Large infographic is found below.