Home » Fake Photos»

The ugly truth about fake news.
Photo credit: StrasserB

To Our Readers,

I’d like to extend my apologies to all of our readers who in the last two days attempted to read our story, “Hog Washed!” and were met with an error message.

We were caught off guard by the huge interest in this story.

You May Also Like...

NYT Article on Serena Williams, Female Tennis Players' Bodies a 'Missed Opportunity'

Until last night, we were hamstrung by a surge of hits that shut down our servers. We publish NASA’s Astrobiology Magazine, which gets millions of hits each month—especially during a NASA event.  We never thought this story would garner the heavy attention it did.

I’d also like to thank all of you who took the time to comment on our online forum. We are committed to a more inclusive and transparent model of journalism, which acknowledges that truth evolves. We believe that thoughtful commentary from readers is a way to develop more comprehensive and robust stories.

Continue Reading - Pages: 1 2 3 View All

Submit a tip / Report a problem


Share this article:

10 Responses

  1. Froad says:

    It was obvious since day 1 that the picture was carefully created using ‘forced perspective’ to make it seem the hog was bigger than it really was. And to answer the question ‘why do we care?’ – It wouldn’t have been a big deal in and of itself, but then comes the greed. Selling posters, t-shirts, putting up a website with advertisements, etc based on something that isnt entirely true. And the worst part is putting his son’s face all over the news, subjecting him to all the criticism and negativity flowing his way. How about putting your own face out there, Mr Stone, instead of letting your child become the scapegoat of your deception?

  2. Bob says:

    It should never cease to amaze what lengths people will go to in order to tear others down. Read their website, and then make your own conclusions about who the liar is. People like you and Ms Shearer should be ashamed at the behavior you are willing to exibit in order to try and get some “fame” of your own. Truly pitiful.

  3. Bubba says:

    He gives you a description of the gun. Although it is behind the hog some it will give you a good idea on the length of the hog. I did and the boy is right!

  4. phil says:

    It’s so obvious on the website that the pics are fake. The pig is apparently large, but the “proof” photos that Mr. Stones published on his website are inconsistent at best. One shows the feral pig being hoisted by a tractor of some sort and it looks to be of a more “normal” size – not the gargantuan beast shown in the most widely distributed photo. Their website also shows two pictures with a group of four people behind the pig. I find it amazing that there is not one minute detail of the subjects’ facial or physical poses that differs from that of the other picture. There is yet another picture of Jameson and his father standing behind the hoisted pig and it is apparent that the pig’s snout is at least a couple feet off the ground and the Stones are standing several feet behind the pig – obviously to make the pig look larger, as the camera angle is from above. And the most telling comparison of all is how the pig seems to “shrink” in the second of the two most widely published photo.Mr. Stone should be ashamed of himself for using his son’s image in this way. He is capitalizing on the “Hogzilla” craze and exploiting his son’s image to his own financial advantage. While his website states that they are not attempting to claim any kind of record he is still teaching his son the wrong lessons in life, and he should have simply been proud of his son’s accomplishment. Instead his greedy quest for a quick buck will likely have a lasting effect on his son in the future.

  5. Ashley says:

    I would like to apologize to Ms Rhonda Shearer, for an earlier email I sent to you. I should have reasearched more an gotten the facts straight, before I sent it. I read the website, and immediately thought that you were just trying to get another story to put on your website, to have more readers, when I realized, that you were trying to help us, and it was the “pig hunters” that were trying to pull the wool over our eyes. Great job, keep up the good work!!!

  6. Chambers says:

    “Does Jamison Stone deserve to suffer inordinately and, perhaps, indefinitely for the hyping of the size of his quarry—a practice hunters have engaged in for centuries? Certainly not.”I love reading this sort of dribble. You espouse an entire view based on getting to the truth, and claim it’s for this Jamison kid’s benefit. The only way Jamison would “suffer” is from people making fun of him and/or calling him a liar. You are doing the latter, so no matter how you spin it, you are in no way stopping suffering….you are the cause of the boy’s suffering.It’s hilarious to see the amount of resources people pour into discrediting a non-substance story such as a kid hunting a pig. You claim it’s because the public wants it? The public also wants to see unflattering pictures of Paris Hilton, but that doesn’t mean respectable journalism should cover it.I just scanned your “story” list. Looks like everything you cover is non-substance. Oh well, first and last time I’ll visit the site…

  7. Ross says:

    To simplify it people, it’s about taking the AP/Fox to task for running unverified information. How can we trust the news? This is like that time Fox ran with a quickly disproved rumor that Obama went to a Muslim fundamentalist school as a child.

  8. Jen says:

    Well looks like you were wrong, really wrong! Read today? Pig is real, get someone else to pick on, maybe not a child this time?

  9. Gary says:

    How can I, as both a naturalist and a hunter, not fall into a pool of muck, oozing with profound sarcasm and disdain, when I comment on the comparison of the farmer’s livestock and the young hunter’s trophy? That’s like comparing an Olympic sprinter to a bed-ridden glutton! Where this domesticated nose-plow has consumed the fruits of many grain harvests and buffet-eatery leavings, the animal of the wild has had to actively scour the land for meager portions of sustenance… where tame porky has been segregated from the herd to wallow in his happy little hole of mud, the boy’s boar had to fight tooth and hoof to defend a territory from intruders and elude the fights he could not win. The farmer’s pork grew fat, sloven and ROUND on legs unwilling to support its mass while the boy’s beast lived by its ability to outrun even the sprinter of earlier mention. I ask those making this comparison: have you ever seen a sway-backed wild mustang, or an overweight whitetail? Your comparisons lack as substantially as your words. I am going to answer your free press question with a positive, but I do so with the fear that there will be another day when I find myself reading a similar story of hurtful speculation driven by unfounded ideals… probably as soon as tomorrow.

  10. spongebob says:

    How can you say that’s a pig???! That is a rabbit, get some glasses. and have you guys never heard of photoshop? That is NOT real.

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *