Menu

Home » Internet Ethics»

(Credit: Twitter)

The Society of Professional Journalists filed an amicus brief in support of Shellee Hale, a blogger told that she wasn’t granted the same source protection rights as a journalist.

A New Jersey appeals court agreed with a lower court decision that Hale is not a journalist.  She was sued by New Jersey company Too Much Media for defamation after she commented in online forums on porn industry website Oprano.com.

However, as the SPJ explained in a press release published on Editor & Publisher, the brief, filed by Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, “does not support Hale’s claim to qualify as a journalist under the shield law. Rather, it seeks to ensure that the court does not improperly narrow the  definition of a journalist under the statute.”

You May Also Like...

After Snooping AP, Obama Admin Backs Media-Friendly Bill on Anonymous Sources, Subpoenas

See iMediaEthics other reporting on Hale’s case here, including our May interview with Hale.

 

Submit a tip / Report a problem

SPJ Backs New Jersey Blogger Shellee Hale in Shield Law Case

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *