Menu

Home » Internet Ethics»

(Credit: MathewIngram.com, screenshot)

Gigaom.com senior writer Mathew Ingram posted highlights from a Twitter debate about linking in news stories. The “discussion” included staff from the New York Times and MIT’s Technology Review, among others.

Ingram explained his argument:

“My point was that adding links should simply be part of the job of writing online, just like checking people’s names and the spelling of words”

Ingram later commented that linking is just part of the purpose of writing articles —  to inform.

You May Also Like...

Tweeting the News: Digital Journalism at DePaul University

O’Reilly Media’s Alex Howard likened linking to footnotes, but The New York Times’ Jacob Harris argued letting readers search for themselves offers “more choice.”

Read more here.

Hat Tip: Poynter

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Twitter Debate on Online Linking

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *