Menu

Home » Fact Checking»

(Credit: Wikimedia)

The New York Times editorial board stands on a press release from The Carter Center that crumbles beneath them as the newspaper failed to fact-check the release or ask the Egyptian government questions about the center for due diligence steps.

When The Carter Center sent a letter to the Egyptian Foreign Ministry that it “officially closed” its office, the date was Aug. 31, 2014.

Without one word of complaint or even mild disappointment, the letter stated:

“At this time, The Center is redirecting its resources to observe electoral events in other countries around the world … Again, we thank you for your kind cooperation over the years.”  [Read the letter in full]

The Carter Center's Aug. 2014 letter

The Carter Center’s letter

So why did a recent Carter Center press release — one that the New York Times editorial board relied on from seven weeks later — claim that the center closed on October 15, 2014?

Most troubling, the press statement asserted a litany of political failings dooming the upcoming Egyptian parliamentary elections as the reason it closed its office, without mention of the Aug. 31 official closing letter that stated the reason was a shift in financial priorities. Its Oct. 15 press release, in contrast with the Aug. 31 letter, states:

“The Carter Center announced today that it has closed its field office in Egypt after nearly three years and that it will not deploy an observation mission to assess Egypt’s parliamentary elections anticipated later this year. This decision reflects The Carter Center’s assessment that the political environment is deeply polarized and that political space has narrowed for Egyptian political parties, civil society, and the media.”

The Oct. 15 press release

The Oct. 14 press release

Carter Center Press Release Contained Misleading Information

The misleading information in The Center’s press release — that it closed in October, not August, and that the reason was democratic repression, not a “redirecting [of] its resources” to other countries after already helping Egypt with five elections — was used as a platform for the New York Times editorial board to then list everything it views wrong with Egyptian politics, from imprisoned journalists to protest laws that require permits.

“The Carter Center wishes to officially inform you of its decision not to organize a mission for Egypt’s anticipated Parliamentary Elections. The Center officially closed its office on August 31, 2014, but a few consultants will remain through September 2014 to ensure logistical closeout.”The Carter Center, Aug. 31, 2014 letter to Egyptian Foreign Ministry

The Times editorial, “From Jimmy Carter, a Rebuke to Egypt,” states:

“Over three decades, the Carter Center in Atlanta, led by former President Jimmy Carter, has established itself as a respected advocate for human rights and democracy … it has thrown in the towel on Egypt.

“In a statement last week, the center announced that it would close its Cairo office after nearly three years and would not send experts to monitor parliamentary elections later this year.”

The editorial concludes: “The center’s withering judgment is a damning critique of Abdel Fattah el-Sisi…” Then, it launches into Egyptian political criticisms.

Oct. 18, 2014 New York Times editorial.

Oct. 18, 2014 New York Times editorial.

iMediaEthics asked the Times, The Carter Center and Egyptian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Badr Abdel Atty for comment.

The Egyptian Foreign Ministry said The Times failed to contact it for comment before publishing the editorial. The Carter Center did not respond to iMediaEthics’ multiple phone calls and e-mails by publication time. We continue to call today but no return calls or emails from the center.

You May Also Like...

Jared Diamond's Tall Tale Gives Journalism a Bad Name

The Times declined by email to comment on our questions. We asked for verification that the Times didn’t contact the ministry before its Carter Center editorial and whether The Carter Center informed them of the Aug. 31 letter to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for Egypt offering reasons for its leaving Egypt, other than the ones the Times presents to its readers.

Finally, iMediaEthics asked the Times if it planned to issue a clarification or correction. In iMediaEthics’ view, the premise of its editorial is gutted if indeed The Carter Center closed in Egypt as it said when it declared itself officially shut for administrative reasons.

Media from Africa quoted from the Aug. 31 letter provided to the press by the Foreign Ministry in regional articles about The Carter Center closing on October 15. iMediaEthics read these reports, then contacted the Foreign Ministry to obtain a copy of the letter. We then asked The Carter Center to verify the letter’s authenticity but noted it is stamped with a Carter Center seal.

The Times editorial is apparently based on the Carter Center’s press release.

Did the New York Times fact check with Egypt? Did it give Egypt an opportunity to respond before publication just in case there are mitigating facts –such as this now-embarrassing Aug. 31, 2014 letter from The Carter Center? Were there any letters following Aug. 31, where The Carter Center did cite complaints like in its press release that the “Center filed required documentation for registration with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but never received formal registration”?

“Absolutely, no,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Atty told iMediaEthics on Sunday.

“Are you sure?” iMediaEthics asked. “No other letters?”

“I’m the spokesperson, no”…“Nothing, Nothing.”

——————————————————————————————————————–
This is part of iMediaEthics’ Investigative series on international media reporting on Egypt. iMediaEthics’ editor-in-chief and publisher, Rhonda Roland Shearer, spent much of May and June in Egypt reporting for this series.

Arabic version of this story found on Almorakib.com
——————————————————————————————————————–

RELATED: Series on international media reporting on Egypt


UPDATE: 3:05PM EST – iMediaEthics continues to call media representatives of the Carter Center but have received no response.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Was NY Times duped by Carter Center press release on Egyptian Office closing?

Share this article:

5 Responses

  1. Sherif Hamdy says:

    Could you please ask NT to explain why they insist to describe the last election in Egypt as ‘rigged vote’, Can NT approve this?

  2. Sydney says:

    Thank you for reading and for your comment, Sherif. Can you please provide specific examples, links and/or headlines so we may look into this? Thanks! Sydney

  3. Sherif Hamdy says:

    Thanks for your reply , you can find example in the following NT editorial artical 18 Oct : http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/19/opinion/sunday/from-jimmy-carter-a-rebuke-to-egypt.html?_r=1
    ” It would also be helpful if Israel, which prides itself on its democracy and has productive ties with Mr. Sisi, encouraged him to abandon the authoritarian course he has followed ever since he got himself elected president in a rigged vote in 2014″
    I really need to know how the election done by attendance of more than 20 million of Egyptian people can easily described as “rigged” , can NT editorial board approve this?

    Also in 4 Oct , they wrote another editorial opinion on the following link : http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/opinion/sunday/reining-in-egypts-military-aid.html?module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3Ar
    “Mr. Sisi, who came to power in a rigged election, seems to think the rest of the world has not noticed. Addressing the General Assembly last week, he claimed, astonishingly, that he was building a new Egypt that “respects rights and freedoms” and “ensures the coexistence of all citizens without exclusion or discrimination.””

    Again !! they insist to call it “Rigged” elections !, i can’t explain how these word hurts million of peoples.

    Thanks for your interest

  4. Sydney says:

    Thank you Sherif. We will look into this. Rhonda is traveling so it may be a couple of days. Sydney

  5. Sydney says:

    Hi Sherif,
    Thanks again for your comment. Just wanted to let you know we haven’t forgotten about your concern and are still looking into it!
    Thank you,
    iMediaEthics

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *