Withhold naming victim? Tackle Tough Ethical Choices in group says Ohio Edi

Home » Media's Future»

(Credit: Ohio.com , screenshot)

In a recent talk to graduate journalism students, Bruce Winges, editor of the Beacon Journal, an Akron, Ohio daily newspaper, advocated that ethical discussions be made after group discussion, according to a report on Kent State University’s journalsim school’s website.  Winges explained:

 “I rarely – if ever – make ethical decisions regarding our newsroom alone. I want to seek as much input as possible to gather as many diverse views as possible. In the end, I will make a decision, and it will be an informed decision.”

As an example of an ethics debate, Winges questioned whether newspapers should withhold naming victims — a standard practice for sexual assault cases — if it turns out they wrongly accused someone.  “What do you do when the accused in a rape case has been found not guilty? What is the purpose of protecting the accuser who now is not a victim? What do you say to the accused if you do not name the accuser?” Winges questioned.

You May Also Like...

Rolling Stone will be sued over UVA Rape Story

According to the university’s report on Winges’ speech:

“After discussing the privacy, fairness, and harm implications, Winges told the students that the paper named the accuser after the court concluded that the suspect was not guilty.”

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Withhold naming victim? Tackle Tough Ethical Choices in group says Ohio Editor

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *