Daily Mail Apologizes to Lily Safra, Not Involved in Husband's Death

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.

Menu

Home » Apologies & Retractions»

The Daily Mail apologized to Lily Safra for suggesting she was involved in her husband's death. (Credit: the Daily Mail)

The Daily Mail apologized to Lily Safra and clarified to readers that the newspaper didn’t mean to “suggest” that Lily Safra had any involvement in the death of her husband, Edmond Safra.  “We accept that there is no basis for such a suggestion and apologise for any distress caused,” the Mail wrote in its Jan. 11 apology.

Edmond Safra, a “billionaire banker,” was killed in 1999, CNN reported at the time.  American nurse Ted Maher was “convicted of arson leading to the death” of Safra, the Associated Press reported in 2002.

One of Lily Safra’s other previous husbands, Alfredo Monteverde, “died in 1969 of two gun-shot wounds to the chest,” according to the New York Post.

According to Tabloid Watch, which spotted the apology, the Sept. story, “So who DID murder Gilded Lily Safra’s billionaire husband?” isn’t on the Daily Mail website anymore.

Press Gazette reported Jan. 5 – almost a week before the apology – that Safra had “launched a legal action” against the Daily Mail’s publisher for libel.  Among Safra’s complaints about the story, “the article included two misleading headlines, with a photograph designed to put her at the very centre of allegations over the ‘unsolved’ murder of her husband.”

Mail on Sunday had published a story that was “strikingly similar” to the Daily Mail story and already apologized to Safra,  Press Gazette noted.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Daily Mail Apologizes to Lily Safra, Not Involved in Husband’s Death

Share this article:

One Response

  1. louis burner says:

    it’s obvious she arranged her 2nd husband’s death, did anyone question her brother’s involvement who seemed to spend the afternoon in the house and was a former security guard… ..money can buy almost anything, like suppression of evidence (twice?)

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *