UK needs new election broadcasting rules, Guardian editor says - iMediaEthics

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.


Home » Ombudsmen/Press Councils»

(Credit: Nick Youngson/CC,Pic Server)

The UK needs new broadcasting rules for elections, the Guardian‘s public editor Paul Chadwick argued.

Chadwick explained that, traditionally, fairness is determined by giving equal airtime to candidates but that standard doesn’t necessarily work anymore.

Today, Dec. 12, is the UK general election.

Specifically, Chadwick questioned if it was fair given some candidates decline to comment, which isn’t a broadcaster’s problem, incumbents typically get more coverage because of their current position, and some candidates are more brief in their remarks than others. In addition, Chadwick noted “To equate time speaking with benefit to the speaker neglects the subject matter and context. What was the audience actually hearing? Was the candidate delivering a campaign-wounding gaffe?”

Chadwick commented, “Lawmakers tend to build new sector-specific regulation on the old, adding to and tweaking a familiar model. But 20th-century broadcasting regulation is not fit for the purposes that regulation, co-regulation and/or self-regulation of communication must fulfill if notions such as an “’informed electorate’ are to survive.”

iMediaEthics has written to OfCom, the regulatory authority for UK broadcasting.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

UK needs new election broadcasting rules, Guardian editor says

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *