Withhold naming victim? Tackle Tough Ethical Choices in group says Ohio Edi

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.


Home » Media's Future»

(Credit: Ohio.com , screenshot)

In a recent talk to graduate journalism students, Bruce Winges, editor of the Beacon Journal, an Akron, Ohio daily newspaper, advocated that ethical discussions be made after group discussion, according to a report on Kent State University’s journalsim school’s website.  Winges explained:

 “I rarely – if ever – make ethical decisions regarding our newsroom alone. I want to seek as much input as possible to gather as many diverse views as possible. In the end, I will make a decision, and it will be an informed decision.”

As an example of an ethics debate, Winges questioned whether newspapers should withhold naming victims — a standard practice for sexual assault cases — if it turns out they wrongly accused someone.  “What do you do when the accused in a rape case has been found not guilty? What is the purpose of protecting the accuser who now is not a victim? What do you say to the accused if you do not name the accuser?” Winges questioned.

According to the university’s report on Winges’ speech:

“After discussing the privacy, fairness, and harm implications, Winges told the students that the paper named the accuser after the court concluded that the suspect was not guilty.”

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Withhold naming victim? Tackle Tough Ethical Choices in group says Ohio Editor

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *