Greensboro News & Record: Only Name Victims If 'There is a Compelling Reaso

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.


Home » Invasion of Privacy»

(Credit: News & Record, screenshot)

The Greensboro, N.C. News & Record will only name crime victims if “there is a compelling reason to do so,” according to an e-mail to staffers from the newspaper’s editor, Jeff Gauger, published by Jim Romenesko.

Gauger noted that there isn’t a reason to name victims in “crime briefs.” “If we’ve deemed a crime story worthy of only three paragraphs, then by definition the facts don’t merit identifying the victims,” he wrote.

Gauger explained that the newspaper isn’t against naming victims, but that reporters ought to “pause and think” before doing so.  Romenesko added that Gauger told him the newspaper recently unnecessarily identified victims in a brief report, leading to the guidance on victim identification.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Greensboro News & Record: Only Name Victims If ‘There is a Compelling Reason’

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.