Reader Questioned Why New York Times Sports Column was Revised Post-Game - iMediaEthics

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.


Home » Editing»

(Credit: NYT, screenshot)

Arthur Brisbane, the New York Times’ public editor, published a series of reader questions and newsroom responses in his Dec. 26 public editor column (see here).

One reader, Ben Carlisle, noted that Times columnist William Rhoden’s Dec. 6 column on National Football League teams the New York Jets and New England Patriots — initially published before the teams played each other — was revised following the game to be “a new, watered-down version that was significantly different.”

Carlisle wondered if the Times permitted rewrites of columns “just because events have proved their opinions to be wrong-headed.”  In response, sports editor Tom Jolly accepted the blame for the incident. Jolly explained that “columnists and feature reporters occasionally write before a big game at night with the idea that it gives them a starting point to update when the game ends, which is often right on deadline, and it gives a presence on the game in the early editions of the paper online.”  Jolly noted that Rhoden’s column was much read on the Times’ website.

Brisbane commented as well, commending Jolly for “falling on his sword on this one.”

iMediaEthics notes that there is a correction appended to the column; however, it doesn’t mention or discuss the apparent revisions to the column.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Reader Questioned Why New York Times Sports Column was Revised Post-Game

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *