Was it OK for NYTimes to Say Ethicist Question Wasn't from Petraeus Biograp

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.

Menu

Home » Anonymous Sources»

(Credit: Twitter, screenshot)

New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan responded to the numerous reports questioning if Paula Broadwell’s husband was behind the July letter to Times Ethicist columnist Chuck Klosterman.

The unsigned letter, published July 13, asked Klosterman if the letter writer should “acknowledge” his wife’s “affair with a government executive” whose “role is to manage a project whose progress is seen worldwide as a demonstration of American leadership.”  The letter notes:

“I have watched the affair intensify over the last year, and I have also benefited from his generosity. He is engaged in work that I am passionate about and is absolutely the right person for the job. I strongly feel that exposing the affair will create a major distraction that would adversely impact the success of an important effort. “

(Klosterman recommended the writer not “expose the way in any high-profile way” since the other man apparently wasn’t “promoting some (contextually hypocritical) family-values platform.”  He also suggested the letter writer directly discuss the affair with his wife and ask for a separation.)

After the Times‘ July letter had recirculated in context with Petraeus’ resignation and affair, Times magazine editor Hugo Lindgren had tweeted Nov. 10:

“This @theethicist column http://nyti.ms/Scgf8j  (2nd Q) is NOT about the Petraeus affair, based on our factchecking. Strange, I know”

Later in a tweet responding to a question about that, Lindgren explained the letter writer “didn’t withhold [his name] from us, just asked that we not publish it.”

Sullivan’s Nov. 13 blogpost addressed concerns that the New York Times could have broken the writer’s trust in identifying that it wasn’t Broadwell’s husband.  She quoted Lindgren as explaining he tweeted the information  in order to “provide accurate information” and in response to “a great deal of speculation.”
Sullivan noted that:

“There are competing journalistic values here. Accuracy is important. So is confidentiality.”

Ultimately, she noted “it’s a close call” but the Times didn’t violate confidentiality in its effort “to quell a rumor for the sake of accuracy.”

In his own post about the issue, “I Lived a CIA Conspiracy Theory,” Klosterman called the speculation “totally bizarre and stupidly predictable.” Klosterman wrote:

“It’s important to remember that there is no evidence whatsoever that this was the case. None. It is 100 percent conjecture. The generic details in the letter fit the circumstances of the affair, and — because the writer is so adamant about the government executive’s import — it does seem like it could feasibly apply to a man of Petraeus’s stature…Nobody claimed to have proof of anything. The only problem is that rumors are now reported with the same tone and structure as hard news, and modern readers (no matter what they claim) have been trained to consume gossip and fact in the exact same way.”

He noted that he “was not involved in that process” of confirming Broadwell’s husband wasn’t the letter writer, and that all he knows is “the guy’s e-mail address” and “what he says his name is.”

“I don’t know what he looks like or to whom he’s married,” Klosterman wrote.

iMediaEthics has written to Lindgren asking if he or the Times would have addressed the speculation had, hypothetically, Broadwell’s husband been behind the letter. We’ll update with any response.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Was it OK for NYTimes to Say Ethicist Question Wasn’t from Petraeus Biographer’s’ Husband?

Share this article:

คาสิโน
สล็อต
sa gaming
tkb365
https://tkb399.com/login
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
ทำความรู้จักกับ
PG
สล็อต
tkb138
sa gaming
https://www.hotelplayagolf.com/es/instalaciones/piscinas
tkb365
บาคาร่า
สล็อตเว็บตรง
บาคาร่า
ทดลองเล่นสล็อตฟรี
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต pg
สล็อตเว็บตรง
สล็อตเว็บตรง
tkb138
ซุปเปอร์สล็อต
tkb138
tkb365
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
changbet789
สูตรสล็อต pg ทดลองเล่นฟรี
สล็อต ดาวน์โหลด รับเครดิตฟรี
สล็อต
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
tkb138
https://www.hotelalbora.com/
https://tkb108.co/register
tkb696
สล็อตเว็บตรง
changbet789
สล็อตทดลอง
pg
betflix
pg slot
สล็อต
pg slot
สล็อตเว็บจริง100%
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
sbobet
ดลองเล่นสล็อต pg
tkb138
https://titanium-hotel.com/
สล็อต
tkb138
taokaebet
tkb777
อันดับแรก
คาสิโน
changbet789
แจกเครดิตฟรี 100%
ทดลองเล่นสล็อตทุกค่ายฟรี
สล็อต
changbet789
tkb365
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
changbet789
finfinbet
คาสิโน
changbet789
tkb108
tkbneko
สล็อตเว็บตรง
สล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อต
https://www.gday96.com/
สล็อต888
สล็อต
PG
บาคาร่าเว็บตรง
changbet789
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต pg
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
ทดลองเล่นสล็อตฟรี
tkb365
tkb365
tkb365
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
TKB96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
tkbsexy
tkbrich
tkbpussy
tkbpg
tkbfun
tkb96
tkb33
tkb9
tkb4
thb889
tkbking
tkb555
tkb365
changbet789
บาคาร่า
คาสิโนออนไลน์
sa gaming
คาสิโนออนไลน์สด
สล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อตเว็บตรง
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต pg ซื้อฟรีสปิน
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
บาคาร่า
สล็อต เว็บตรงไม่ผ่านเอเย่นต์ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ