National Review deletes 'Covington students might as well have just spit on the Cross' article - iMediaEthics

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.


Home » Apologies & Retractions»

The National Review published an article headlined, “The Covington Students Might as well have Just Spit on the Cross.” Within a day, though, the conservative news site unpublished and apologized for the article.

The now-unpublished article is available via Google cache. In it, the writer, the National Review‘s deputy managing editor Nicholas Frankovich compared the students and Nathan Phillips, respectively, to “Roman soldiers to his Christ.”

“Decide for yourself who is more pleasing to Christ, Phillips or his mockers,” Frankovich wrote. “As for the putatively Catholic students from Covington, they might as well have just spit on the cross and got it over with.”

In a Jan. 21 apology, National Review‘s Frankovich wrote:

“Early Sunday morning, I posted a “strongly worded” (Rich Lowry’s description) condemnation of the conduct, seen far and wide on video, of a group of high-school students at the conclusion of the March for Life on Friday afternoon. I was preachy and rhetorically excessive, and I regret it. The overheated post I wrote has been taken down. Let this apology stand in its stead, both here on the Corner and in the memory of readers who justifiably objected to my high-handedness.”

The Wrap noted that National Review editor-in-chief Rich Lowry also deleted one of his tweets about the incident.

iMediaEthics has contacted Lowry and tweeted Frankovich.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

National Review deletes ‘Covington students might as well have just spit on the Cross’ article

Share this article:

2 Responses

  1. JTLiuzza says:

    If he had one ounce of integrity he’d leave his initial remarks up with his apology attached to it. It’s easier for him to erase the evidence of his stupidity, shoddy journalism, and eagerness to pile on a high school kid who exhibited more guts and integrity than all of the neocon liberal yahoos over at National Review posses combined.

  2. Dcoach51 says:

    Interesting.. why would the NR employ a man who would blatantly attack this group of young Christian men without proper investigation and on the innuendo from a leftist news company…he certainly could have taken the other side and defended their non violent position and unbelievable fortitude..times have really changed..I do hope that the lawyers for the young men sue all the libelists and shut them all down as they are all as relevant as the National Enquirer…just terrible…just terrible..

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *