Ombudsman-Lite? Washington Post to Replace Ombudsman with Readers Rep

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.


Home » Ombudsmen/Press Councils»

(Credit: Washington Post, screenshot, highlight added)

The Washington Post announced today that it won’t replace Patrick Pexton, whose two-year term as ombudsman ended yesterday, with another ombudsman. Instead, the newspaper plans to “appoint a reader representative shortly to address our readers’ concerns and questions.”

As the Post explained in a note from publisher Katharine Weymouth:

“Unlike ombudsmen in the past, the reader representative will be a Post employee. The representative will not write a weekly column for the page but will write online and/or in the newspaper from time to time to address reader concerns, with responses from editors, reporters or business executives as appropriate.”

iMediaEthics is writing to the Organization of News Ombudsmen’s Jeffrey Dvorkin for comment on this move. We’ll update with any response.

UPDATE: 3/1/2013: 5:52 PM ET:  The Organization of News Ombudsmen’s executive director Jeffrey Dvorkin commented on the Post’s decision. In an email to iMediaEthics, Dvorkin wrote:

“I would say that having a readers’ representative for the Washington Post is still an indication that the newspaper takes its obligations to the public seriously. Hopefully, the terms of employment for the readers’ representative will allow for as much independence as was granted to the previous ombuds.”

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Ombudsman-Lite? WashPost to Replace Ombudsman with Readers Rep

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *