PCC Rejects Julian Assange's Complaint

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.


Home » Fact Checking»

(Credit: PCC.org.uk)

WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange complained to the UK print regulatory body the Press Complaints Commission over a review of Assange’s autobiography, Julian Assange: The Unauthorised Autobiography, Journalism.co.uk reported.

As we wrote, Canongate publisher published the autobiography without Assange’s consent in September.  Assange noted in his criticism of the publication that he didn’t get to fact check the book before publication.

The review in question was written by the Guardian’s James Ball, who worked for Wikileaks for a short period.

Assange’s complaint was over the review’s “reference to ‘charges’ against” Assange, according to Journalism.co.uk.  Assange hasn’t been charged but is wanted for questioning in Sweden related to two sexual assault cases, as we have written.

While “the PCC acknowledged that there had been no formal charges…it ruled however that the reviewer, the Guardian’s James Ball, had ‘alluded to ‘charges’ more generally,” Journalism.co.uk reported. As such, the PCC “rejected” Assange’s complaint since the review wasn’t specific enough to be “significantly inaccurate.”

Submit a tip / Report a problem

PCC Rejects Julian Assange’s Autobiography Complaint

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *