WaPo Ombuds Defends 4 Front-Page Pix of James Holmes

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.


Home » Ombudsmen/Press Councils»

(Credit: Twitter, screenshot)

Washington Post readers complained that the newspaper’s publishing four front-page pictures of James Holmes gave “attention” or “potential for copycats,” ombudsman Patrick Pexton wrote.

Pexton defended the publication of the pictures because outside of a school photo, they were “newsworthy” as “the first authorized and verifiable” images and as supportive of his “conduct in the courtroom” as “odd.”

Pexton wrote:

“The readers may be right that publicity could inspire copycats or give the alleged shooter the notoriety he may have been seeking. But it’s just as likely the photographs will have no effect… It may be that Holmes is a cold-blooded killer, a troubled or insane young man hell-bent on notoriety. But he is also a human being, a man of flesh and blood like the rest of us, and the public has a right and duty to see him for who he is.”

Submit a tip / Report a problem

WaPo Ombuds Defends 4 Front-Page Pix of James Holmes

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *