Menu

Home » Ombudsmen/Press Councils»

(Credit: The Star)

Journalists should avoid the term “voodoo economics” because it’s “a derogatory cliché,” the Toronto Star’s Kathy English recommended.

The term, which English noted originated in the 1980 presidential primaries, was used recently in a Toronto Star editorial and prompted some complaints.

University of Windsor associate professor Richard Douglass-Chin argued that the term is a “dismissive and racist misnomer,” English wrote. M. NourbeSe Philip explained that voodoo is a “derogatory, racist term for a complex spirirtual and social practice which is misunderstood by Westerners.” The term doesn’t just insult the Vodun religion but also its people, Philip wrote.

You May Also Like...

The Huffington Post Steals a Penis Story

English agreed that it’s an unnecessary term but said she didn’t think it was used out of racism. “I certainly don’t think there was any ‘racist’ intent in the Star’s use of this phrase,” she wrote. “For better or worse, this is an issue to which no one here seems to have given any prior thought and there was no understanding of the possibility of causing offence.”

Moving forward the Star won’t plan to use the term, but it also won’t issue “a complete ban” because interviewees may use it.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Toronto Star will avoid ‘Voodoo Economics’ term after complaints

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *