CNN corrects Trump, WikiLeaks story claiming anonymous sources gave

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.

Menu

Home » Anonymous Sources»

(Credit: Wikipedia)

A CNN report, based on anonymous sources, said that Donald Trump and his son, Donald Trump Jr., received an e-mail Sept. 4, 2016, with information about hacked WikiLeaks documents.

But the sources for CNN’s story were wrong; the e-mail was actually sent on Sept. 14, when the WikiLeaks encryption key was public. Now CNN has corrected its story, noting in the text of its article that since the e-mail was Sept. 14, not Sept. 4, “the communication is less significant than CNN initially reported.”

CNN has since posted this correction. The error was corrected after about 8 hours.

Correction: This story has been corrected to say the date of the email was September 14, 2016, not September 4, 2016. The story also changed the headline and removed a tweet from Donald Trump Jr., who posted a message about WikiLeaks on September 4, 2016.”

CNN’s PR team also tweeted a correction about the Trump, WikiLeaks error explaining, “CNN’s initial reporting of the date on an email sent to members of the Trump campaign about Wikileaks documents, which was confirmed by two sources to CNN, was incorrect. We have updated our story to include the correct date, and present the proper context for the timing of email.”

On Twitter, CNN senior media correspondent Brian Stelter reported that CNN won’t discipline the reporter Manu Raju who published the story because he “followed the editorial standards process” and “multiple sources provided him with incorrect info.”

Submit a tip / Report a problem

CNN corrects Trump, WikiLeaks story, claiming anonymous sources provided the wrong date

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *