Robert Niles : Journalism Should Embrace Online News Aggregation

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.

Menu

Home » Internet Ethics»

Robert Niles, from his bio page at NewsInitiative.org.

“What’s the difference between aggregation and creating journalism?” Robert Niles asks in a March 2 post at the Online Journalism Review.

His essay, an edited transcript of remarks made at the WAN-IFRA Future of News Media and Journalism Conference in Singapore, argues that journalism needs to negotiate the space between old models of ethics and new models of financial efficiency.

Niles, a journalist, who worked as an Internet editor for top newspapers, the (Denver) Rocky Mountain News and the Los Angeles Times, calls his opening query a “trick question” because, according to him, aggregation and content production are actually “the same thing.”

“In journalism, our ‘original’ content always has been the product of aggregation,” he writes. “We aggregate interviews from sources; we aggregate documents that we ask find or ask for; we aggregate our observations of people, places and events.”

Niles argues the real question is how to practice aggregation/creation in a way that offers the most monetary value and ethical/social value. It’s new aggregation–what Niles describes as “using automation, like Google News does, and social media, like Facebook, to bring together sources of information,” vs. old aggregation (journalism)–“with a traditional newsroom model for reporting, editing and page design.”

New aggregation offers better value, Niles says. “Even if a traditional newspaper delivers more social benefit to an audience than an online aggregator, the difference in production costs favors the online upstart.”

“But is there any social value in the cheaply produced aggregation that we’re now seeing proliferate around the Internet?” he asks, writing,

The challenge for the newspaper industry now is to take a look at what these start-up aggregators are doing and perhaps, from that, learn what traditional newsrooms can do to change, to aggregate the information that they’ve been collecting from their communities in ways that are less expensive, and that would better serve the community.

Niles suggests that integrating reader-contributed content rather than marginalizing it to separate pages may be one way to adapt new aggregation techniques toward increasing the dollar value of high social-value old journalism.

And if journalism is analogous to aggregation, then reader-contributed content is also equivalent to reporting. Journalism must also mold, translate, and vet that reporting/raw material. “We need people who can create tools that support thriving, responsible online communities,” Niles writes, “instead of relying on off-the-shelf commenting and discussion forum tools that are too easily hijacked by trolls.”

Niles also calls for a two-way street; you aggregate my back, I’ll aggregate yours. “We’ve got to get over the mindset that aggregation is a bad thing,” he writes. “That mindset keeps us from developing tools that allow readers to aggregate our content, and by doing so, becoming partners with us in an information community.”

However, aggregation can sometimes be a bad thing. Sharing content, this two-way street Niles describes, only works if the aggregated and the aggregator feel that they are both receiving some benefit, or at least respect. That’s why journalists put quotes in quotation marks, ask people before they interview them and cite sources and facts.

Niles doesn’t stress some of the important baselines that anyone, whether aggregator or journalist, should follow in dealing with content, ideas, or stories created by other people in this “information community”–giving credit, linking, attributing quotes, respecting scoops, etc. (StinkyJournalism has written more about that in two other posts.)

However, he does make sure to clarify in a comment below his post, that aggregation, as he describes it, does not accommodate “scraping” or republishing others’ content in full without attribution or credit. If pushed too far, “scaping” is plagiarism. Arguably, if journalism is aggregation, “scraping” is not.

Many journalists might balk at the thought that their practice is in any way equivalent to what most people think of as modern aggregation. But Niles does have a point that journalists shouldn’t reject new tools to gather, discuss, and transmit news and information in the public interest if those tools manage to conform to the ethical principles of journalism already held.
Check out the lecture in full here.

 

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Robert Niles : Journalism Should Embrace Online News Aggregation

Share this article:

คาสิโน
slot demo
sa gaming
tkb365
https://tkb399.com/login
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
ทำความรู้จักกับ
PG
สล็อต
tkb138
ซุปเปอร์สล็อต
sa gaming
https://www.hotelplayagolf.com/es/instalaciones/piscinas
tkb365
บาคาร่า
สล็อตเว็บตรง
บาคาร่า
ทดลองเล่นสล็อตฟรี
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต pg
สล็อตเว็บตรง
tkb138
ซุปเปอร์สล็อต
tkb138
tkb365
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
changbet789
สูตรสล็อต pg ทดลองเล่นฟรี
สล็อต ดาวน์โหลด รับเครดิตฟรี
สล็อต
tkb138
https://www.hotelalbora.com/
https://tkb108.co/register
tkb696
changbet789
สล็อตทดลอง
pg
betflix
pg slot
สล็อต
สล็อต
sbobet
บาคาร่า
tkb138
https://titanium-hotel.com/
สล็อต
tkb138
taokaebet
tkb777
อันดับแรก
คาสิโน
changbet789
แจกเครดิตฟรี 100%
ทดลองเล่นสล็อตทุกค่ายฟรี
สล็อต
changbet789
tkb365
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
changbet789
finfinbet
คาสิโน
changbet789
tkb108
tkbneko
สล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อต
https://www.gday96.com/
สล็อต888
สล็อต
PG
บาคาร่าเว็บตรง
changbet789
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต pg
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
ทดลองเล่นสล็อตฟรี
tkb365
tkb365
tkb365
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
TKB96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
tkbsexy
tkbrich
tkbpussy
tkbpg
tkbfun
tkb96
tkb33
tkb9
tkb4
thb889
tkbking
tkb555
tkb365
changbet789
บาคาร่า
คาสิโนออนไลน์
sa gaming
คาสิโนออนไลน์สด
สล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อตเว็บตรง
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต pg ซื้อฟรีสปิน
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
บาคาร่า
สล็อต เว็บตรงไม่ผ่านเอเย่นต์ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
สล็อต
บาคาร่า
สล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อต
คาสิโน
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
sa gaming