US Federal Appeals Court Rules--Mug Shots NOT included in FOIA

Home » Media's Future»

A federal appeals court in Georgia agreed with a Florida district court that mug shot photos aren’t included in the Freedom of Information Act, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press reported. The Atlanta, Georgia Appeals Court and the southern district of Florida court both ruled that mug shot access is a breach of “the personal privacy rights of those depicted.”

The Florida district court found “a booking photograph is a unique and powerful type of photograph that raises personal privacy interests distinct from normal photographs . . . [it] captures the subject in the vulnerable and embarrassing moments immediately after being accused, taken into custody, and deprived of most liberties.” Also, mug shots aren’t in the public interest, outside of “satisfying voyeuristic curiousities.”

However, the decision “creates a split in the circuits,” because a 1996 appeals court in Cincinnati decided that mug shots didn’t have any “recognizable personal privacy.”

Read more about the case on Reporters Committtee for Freedom of the Press here. See the Florida district court ruling here.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

US Federal Appeals Court Rules–Mug Shots NOT included in FOIA

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *