Thugs is not Objective - iMediaEthics

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.


Home » Bias»

CNN anchor Anderson Cooper tweeted July 11 “Thugs attack us embassy in #syria. This is from the #Mubarak playbook. Details #ac360 10p.”

The attack, which has been “condemned” by the U.N. Security Council, included “mobs of hundreds of supporters of Assad’s regime [who] attacked the American and French embassies, smashing windows and spray-painting obscenities on the wall,” according to MSNBC.

But, Anderson’s use of the word “thug” is questionable, as the term is clearly not an objective descriptor.  The word “thug,” as defined by, means “a cruel or vicious ruffian, robber, or murderer.”  Merriam-Webster defines the term as “a brutal ruffian or assassin.”

Submit a tip / Report a problem

Thugs is not Objective

Share this article:

Comments Terms and Conditions

  • We reserve the right to edit/delete comments which harass, libel, use coarse language and profanity.
  • We moderate comments especially when there is conflict or negativity among commenters.
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *