UK Judge: Nature Didn't Libel Editor, Story in Public Interest

iMediaEthics publishes international media ethics news stories and investigations into journalism ethics lapses.

Menu

Home » Libel»

(Credit: Nature, screenshot)

A UK court ruled that Nature didn’t libel another journal’s editor in a 2008 article about the editor’s retirement, Nature reported.

The 2008 article “Self-publishing Editor Set to Retire,” was critical of Chaos, Solitons and Fractals editor Mohamed El Naschie and reported that El Naschie has published “nearly 60” of his own papers. Nature also reported criticism of the “quality” of El Naschie’s work and claims that his work wasn’t peer reviewed.  El Naschie, who founded the journal, defended his work.

Justice Sharp’s July 7 ruling found Nature‘s report to be “responsible journalism” with “a high order of public interest,” according to Nature.

Further, Sharp agreed with Nature‘s reporting, writing that El Naschie “had little if any interest in the norms of scientific publishing or the ethical considerations which underpinned them,” that his “self-publication in CSF was excessive and unwarranted and amounted to an abuse of his position as Editor-in-Chief,” and that El Naschie’s “papers were not the subject of any, or any proper, peer review at all.”

Nature noted that its case has been used in calls for UK libel reform and that even the current draft libel reform bill “would put in place protection for statements made in peer-reviewed articles, but would not necessarily protect news stories such as the article in Nature.”

Press Gazette reported Nature’s lawyer Niri Shan said

“The judgment is an important victory for free speech, and is a shot in the arm for the public interest defence of qualified privilege.

“Having said that, the fact that the claimant was able to bring this matter to trial highlights the urgent need for libel reform in the area of science reporting, as the law, as it currently stands, is stifling scientific debate.  Moreover, even the current reforms being considered by Parliament do not go far enough.”

The BBC explained:  “A public interest defence would put the onus on the person suing for libel to show that the writer either intended to be malicious or was reckless in writing the article.”

Nature issued a statement with comments from its reporter, and editors about the ruling.  Reporter Quirin Schiermeier is quoted as calling the ruling a “powerful confirmation of the high journalistic standards we apply at Nature.”

We’ve written previously about the case of UK writer Simon Singh, who was sued by the British Chiropractic Association over a 2008 Guardian article in which he criticized chiropractors.  We wrote in 2010 when a British appeals court ruled that Singh could defend his article as fair comment.

We have written to Nature and El Maschie for comment and will update with any response.

Submit a tip / Report a problem

UK Judge: Nature Didn’t Libel Editor, Story in Public Interest

Share this article:

คาสิโน
sa gaming
tkb365
https://tkb399.com/login
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
ทำความรู้จักกับ
PG
สล็อต
tkb138
sa gaming
https://www.hotelplayagolf.com/es/instalaciones/piscinas
tkb365
บาคาร่า
สล็อตเว็บตรง
บาคาร่า
ทดลองเล่นสล็อตฟรี
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต pg
สล็อตเว็บตรง
tkb138
ซุปเปอร์สล็อต
tkb138
tkb365
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
changbet789
สูตรสล็อต pg ทดลองเล่นฟรี
สล็อต ดาวน์โหลด รับเครดิตฟรี
สล็อต
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
tkb138
https://www.hotelalbora.com/
https://tkb108.co/register
tkb696
สล็อตเว็บตรง
changbet789
สล็อตทดลอง
pg
betflix
pg slot
สล็อต
pg slot
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
sbobet
บาคาร่า
tkb138
https://titanium-hotel.com/
สล็อต
tkb138
taokaebet
tkb777
อันดับแรก
คาสิโน
changbet789
แจกเครดิตฟรี 100%
ทดลองเล่นสล็อตทุกค่ายฟรี
สล็อต
changbet789
tkb365
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
changbet789
finfinbet
คาสิโน
changbet789
tkb108
tkbneko
สล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อต
https://www.gday96.com/
สล็อต888
สล็อต
PG
บาคาร่าเว็บตรง
changbet789
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต pg
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
ทดลองเล่นสล็อตฟรี
tkb365
tkb365
tkb365
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkb555
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
tkbking
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
thb889
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb4
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb9
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
tkb33
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
finfinbet
TKB96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkb96
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbfun
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpg
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbpussy
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbrich
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkbsexy
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
tkb777
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
taokaebet
tkbsexy
tkbrich
tkbpussy
tkbpg
tkbfun
tkb96
tkb33
tkb9
tkb4
thb889
tkbking
tkb555
tkb365
changbet789
บาคาร่า
คาสิโนออนไลน์
sa gaming
คาสิโนออนไลน์สด
สล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อตเว็บตรง
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต pg ซื้อฟรีสปิน
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
บาคาร่า
สล็อต เว็บตรงไม่ผ่านเอเย่นต์ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ
ทดลองเล่นสล็อต
สล็อต
บาคาร่า
สล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อต
คาสิโน