BIG STORIES :
News Corp. | Phone Hacking Scandal | WikiLeaks | Barack Obama | Julian Assange | 2012 U.S. Election | Religion | See All
iMEDIAETHICS.org
Seperator
 
Tips Facebook Twitter Twitter Twitter RSS Feeds
 
Home | | Contact Us

International Media Ethics News :
Daily Media Pick
Comments (0)
Print Tweet Email

German Media Falls for Wikipedia Prank...But Claim They Were Victims

By: Danielle Mastropiero
March 03, 2009 12:00 AM EST
 
German Media Falls for Wikipedia Prank...But Claim They Were Victims
 
Wikipedia acknowledges that errors can occur and researchers need to fact check using additional sources. Then why do German media complain that they were duped when a Wiki-hoaxer added an extra name to a politician moniker? The journalists instead of blaming Wikipedia, should have picked up the phone and called the politician's office to verify his name before publication.
 

The Local, an English language German news site, reports that the German press ran to Wikipedia to research the country’s new Economy Minister and emerged with egg on their face thanks to a prankster.

According to The Local, the evening before Economy Minister "Karl-Theodor Maria Nikolaus Johann Jakob Philipp Franz Joseph Sylvester Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg" was named to his post, a Wiki hoaxer added “Wilhelm” to the nominee’s already lengthy moniker.

The anonymous poster cited his intention as seeing if anyone would notice.

Without first fact checking the Wikipedia entry, German mainstream media outlets rushed and ended up publishing the hoaxer's intentional error.

As if the mistake didn’t make newspapers look foolish enough, the newspapers chided the falsified name. Newspaper Bild even ran the altered name under a snarky front-page headline reading, “Do we have to remember this name?”

Many outlets later printed corrections that appear to do a more effective job of blaming the prankster than their own shoddy reporting for the mishap.

Bild claimed zu Guttenberg was a “victim of falsification” that the media “fell into.”  Spiegel Online admitted “insufficient research” but added there was “a manipulation of the internet encyclopedia Wikipedia” and that “time pressure was great.”  How tight are the deadlines in Germany that media professionals can’t spare even a minute to check a formal source to clarify someone’s name? Pick up the phone!

According to Wikipedia’s About page,“Visitors do not need specialized qualifications to contribute... Most of the articles can be edited by anyone with access to the Internet.”  The page even admits that while editors often swoop in to correct mistakes, “newer articles tend more frequently contain significant misinformation, unencyclopedic content and vandalism” and advises users to be aware of this. Their research guide even declares that “In most academic institutions Wikipedia is unacceptable as a major source for a research paper.”

Too bad the German media didn’t follow Wikipedia's warnings and make one simple phone call to the new Minister's office to verify his name.

Line
Print   Print
Line
Twitter   Tweet
Report an Error Report an Error
Email   E-mail
Link Send a Tip
 
 
  RESOURCES FOR EDUCATORS
 
Checkout iMediaEthics Resources for Educators, a helpful section for colleges, institutions, students and teachers.
Ethics Codes Case Studies Sites We Like
Ethics Codes Case Studies Sites We Like
 
   DAVID MOORE ON POLLS [See All]   
9 in 10 Americans can be classified as Racist against Either Blacks or Whites?  What the AP Poll on Racial Attitudes really tells Us, Part 2.
PollSkeptic Report:   9 in 10 Americans can be classified as Racist...
What the AP Poll on Racial Attitudes Really Tells Us, Part 1
PollSkeptic Report:   What the AP Poll on Racial Attitudes Really Tells...
David Moore
PollTalk Blog:   3 in 10 Voters Believe Armed Revolution Might Be...
   MORE BY THIS AUTHOR [See All]   
   SIMILAR TOPIC
 
CNN Covers Up Error in Cleveland Kidnappings Case: Amanda Berry NOT Ariel Castro's Daughter's Best Friend
CNN Covers Up Error in Cleveland Kidnappings Case: Amanda Berry NOT Ariel Castro's Daughter's Best Friend
CNN's Michael Martinez made an error in his May 12...
 
Sports Reporter Fired after 'Tremendous Amount of Sex' Freudian Slip
Sports Reporter Fired after 'Tremendous Amount of Sex' Freudian Slip
Comcast SportsNet Chicago fired sports reporter Susannah...
 
Toronto Star's Front-Page Apology 1st in 18 Years, Story was 'Entirely Wrong,' Public Editor Says
Toronto Star's Front-Page Apology 1st in 18 Years, Story was 'Entirely Wrong,' Public Editor Says
 
Bronx 5-Alarm Blaze Fact Check Shows Sloppy Local Reporting, Not Just In National Breaking News Coverage
Bronx 5-Alarm Blaze Fact Check Shows Sloppy Local Reporting, Not Just In National Breaking News Coverage
It is easy to critique the media for errors during...
 
   TWITTER
   FACEBOOK
   LATEST STORIES [See All]